20 Pages Posted: 22 Oct 2007 Last revised: 29 Oct 2009
Date Written: October 28, 2009
The static tradeoff theory of capital structure predicts that firms aim to approach a target debt ratio. The theory provides several firm characteristics that determine this target ratio. In contrast, the pecking order model rejects a target debt ratio, because firms are expected to finance investments subsequently from (internal) equity, debt, and (external) equity. A fundamental problem in empirical studies is that having a target debt ratio or not is unobservable from public data. We use survey evidence from 235 CFOs to discriminate static tradeoff firms from pecking order firms and relate the responses to public data. For the two sets of firms we estimate standard capital structure models and find that pecking order firms contaminate static tradeoff theory-based estimations.
Keywords: pecking order theory, static tradeoff theory
JEL Classification: C42, G32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
de Jong, Abe and Verwijmeren, Patrick, To Have a Target Debt Ratio or Not: What Difference Does it Make? (October 28, 2009). Applied Financial Economics, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1023581