34 Pages Posted: 26 Oct 2007
This article reexamines the well-known debate over the orgins and timing of the advent of de jure segregation in the American South that began in 1955 with the publication of C. Vann Woodward's The Strange Career of Jim Crow. Arguing that the terms of the debate over Woodward's thesis implicate familiar but outmoded ways of looking at sociolegal change and Southern society, the article proposes a reorientation of this debate using theoretical perspectives taken from recent work by legal historians, critical race theorists, and historians of race, class and gender. This article examines the advent of railroad segregation in Tennnessee (the state that enacted America's first railroad segregation statute) in order to sketch out these themes, arguing that de jure segregation was brought about by a dialectic between legal, social and identity-based phenomena. This dialectic did not die out the the coming of de jure segregation, but rather continued into the modern era.
Keywords: Segregation, Jim Crow, Race Discrimination, Critical Race Theory, Legal History, Feminist Legal Theory, Women's Legal History, Civil Rights, Civil Rights Litigation
JEL Classification: J70, J71, J78, K42
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Mack, Kenneth W., Law, Society, Identity and the Making of the Jim Crow South: Travel and Segregation on Tennessee Railroads, 1875-1905. Law of Social Inquiry, Vol. 24, No. 4, 1999. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1024665 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.158829