The Incidence of a U.S. Carbon Tax: A Lifetime and Regional Analysis
42 Pages Posted: 31 Oct 2007 Last revised: 16 Jul 2022
Date Written: October 2007
Abstract
This paper measures the direct and indirect incidence of a carbon tax using current income and two measures of lifetime income to rank households. Our results suggest that carbon taxes are more regressive when annual income is used as a measure of economic welfare than when proxies for lifetime income are used. Further, the direct component of the tax, in any given year, is significantly more regressive than the indirect component. In fact, for 1987, the indirect component of the tax is mildly progressive. We observe a modest shift over time with the direct component of carbon taxes becoming less regressive and the indirect component becoming more regressive. These effects mostly offset each other and the distribution of the total tax burden has not changed much over time. In addition we find that regional variation has fluctuated over the years of our anlaysis. By 2003 there is little systematic variation in carbon tax burdens across regions of the country.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Don Fullerton and Gilbert E. Metcalf
-
Assessment of U.S. Cap-and-Trade Proposals
By Sergey Paltsev, John M. Reilly, ...
-
Lifetime Incidence and the Distributional Burden of Excise Taxes
-
By A. Lans Bovenberg, Lawrence H. Goulder, ...
-
Environmental Taxes and the Double-Dividend Hypothesis: Did You Really Expect Something for Nothing?
By Don Fullerton and Gilbert E. Metcalf
-
The General Equilibrium Incidence of Environmental Taxes
By Don Fullerton and Garth Heutel
-
The General Equilibrium Incidence of Environmental Mandates
By Don Fullerton and Garth Heutel
-
The Incidence of Pollution Control Policies
By Ian W. H. Parry, Hilary Sigman, ...