The Good Faith Acquisition of Stolen Art
28 Pages Posted: 31 Oct 2007 Last revised: 20 Aug 2008
Date Written: October 29, 2007
Abstract
Good faith purchasers of stolen goods fare differently in Western legal systems. American rules favor the owner, while the civil law world protects the good faith purchaser. Oddly, this striking difference is misunderstood or denied or both by American scholars. American lawyer-economists who have considered which is the better rule differ in their perceptions and conclusions, as do the positions taken by non-economists. A related difference exists in the application of statutes of limitation in good faith purchaser cases. Proposals that it would be fairer to split the loss seem bound to fail. A solution involving the Art Loss Register and the New York courts' use of the laches doctrine is more promising.
Keywords: art, theft, contract, good faith purchaser
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Intellectual Property as Property: Delineating Entitlements in Information
-
Augmenting the Value of Ownership by Protecting it Only Partially: The 'Market-Overt' Rule Revisited
By Barak Medina
-
The Proprietary Foundations of Corporate Law
By John Armour and Michael J. Whincop
-
Legal Capital: An Outdated Concept?
By John Armour
-
The Firm as an Entity Before the Companies Acts
By Joshua Getzler and Mike Macnair