כללי אזכור בכתיבה משפטית — הרהורים על עיצוב נורמות של שיח (Legal Citation Rules: Reflections on the Formation of Discourse Norms)

Haifa Law Review, Vol. 3, pp. 239-274, 2007

38 Pages Posted: 1 Nov 2007 Last revised: 18 Jun 2018

Shulamit Almog

University of Haifa - Faculty of Law

Ronen Perry

University of Haifa - Faculty of Law

Date Written: October 18, 2012

Abstract

In the spring of 2006, an 80 pages booklet, sponsored by four Israeli law reviews, and titled Uniform Citation Rules in Legal Writing, was published in Israel. Given its cover color and notable similarity to the American Bluebook, we called it The Purplebook. The Haifa Law Review had to decide whether to substitute the new rules for its traditional citation method. The Editors' reflections on this seemingly technical matter generated interesting queries about the need for uniform citation rules, the process of their formulation, endorsement and modification, their substance and their form. The unprecedented opportunity to seriously deliberate on the various aspects of legal citation has yielded this essay. To begin with, the essay examines the need for uniformity in citation, and discusses the advantages and shortcomings of such uniformity on different levels of abstraction. Considerations pertaining to aesthetics, efficiency, and preservation of unique-identities (pluralism) go against the attempt to impose a uniform set of citation rules on Hebrew legal writing in its entirety. Next the essay appraises the production process of the new booklet on two levels. First, it presents the historical development of legal citation rules in Israel and demonstrates that the Purplebook pretends to be the successor of a long-standing custom, where none actually existed, and makes false claims of originality by ignoring the historical background - as a means for acquiring legitimacy and authority. Second, the essay criticizes the exclusion of second- and third-tier journals from the process - as a means for perpetuating the existing hierarchy in Israeli system of legal education. Finally, the essay criticizes the Purplebook's substance and form from various theoretical perspectives. The conclusions have led to an outright rejection of the new rules by the editorial board of the Haifa Law Review.

Note: Downloadable document is in Hebrew.

Keywords: legal citation, legal writing, law reviews, law journals, legal publishing, discourse norms

JEL Classification: K00

Suggested Citation

Almog, Shulamit and Perry, Ronen, כללי אזכור בכתיבה משפטית — הרהורים על עיצוב נורמות של שיח (Legal Citation Rules: Reflections on the Formation of Discourse Norms) (October 18, 2012). Haifa Law Review, Vol. 3, pp. 239-274, 2007. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1025530

Shulamit Almog

University of Haifa - Faculty of Law ( email )

Mount Carmel
Haifa, 31905
Israel

Ronen Perry (Contact Author)

University of Haifa - Faculty of Law ( email )

Mount Carmel
Haifa, 31905
Israel

HOME PAGE: http://weblaw.haifa.ac.il/en/faculty/perry/

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
38
Abstract Views
1,257
PlumX