Auditor Fees and Audit Quality

Posted: 1 Nov 2007

See all articles by Rani Hoitash

Rani Hoitash

Bentley University - Department of Accountancy

Ariel J. Markelevich

Suffolk University

Charles A. Barragato

Stony Brook University

Abstract

The paper aims to examine the relation between fees paid to auditors and audit quality during the period of 2000-2003. The paper constructs a measure of auditor profitability that is used as a proxy for auditor independence. The methodology is grounded in the notion that auditor independence is influenced by effort and risk-adjusted fees, rather than the level of fees received from clients. Since, risk and effort are unobservable, the paper uses proxies based on client size, complexity and risk to estimate abnormal fees. Abnormal fees are derived using a fee estimation model drawn from prior literature. The paper employs two metrics to assess audit quality - the standard deviation of residuals from regressions relating current accruals to cash flows and the absolute value of performance-adjusted discretionary accruals. The paper documents a statistically significant negative association between total fees and both audit quality proxies over all years. These findings are robust to a variety of additional tests and several alternative design specifications. The results (pre- and post-SOX) are consistent with economic bonding being a determinant of auditor behavior rather than auditor reputational concerns. The possibility that the empirical tests do not completely capture the impact of unobserved risk cannot be ruled out, though the paper attempts to do so by employing alternative specifications and sensitivity tests. Policy makers should note that current restrictions on the provision of non-audit services may not sufficiently resolve the issue of economic bonding and its impact on auditor independence. In contrast to previous studies whose results are ambiguous, the paper finds a statistically significant positive association between several measures of total fees (it uses size-adjusted and abnormal fees) and two metrics of accruals quality in all years (2000-2003), consistent with economic bonding being a determinant of auditor behavior rather then auditor reputation concerns.

Keywords: Auditor¿s fees, Auditors, Quality

JEL Classification: M49, G34, G38, L84

Suggested Citation

Hoitash, Rani and Markelevich, Ariel J. and Barragato, Charles A., Auditor Fees and Audit Quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 22, No. 8, 2007. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1025904

Rani Hoitash

Bentley University - Department of Accountancy ( email )

175 Forest Street
Waltham, MA 02452-4705
United States

Ariel J. Markelevich (Contact Author)

Suffolk University ( email )

Sawyer Business School
120 Tremont Street
Boston, MA 02108
United States
617-305-2713 (Phone)

Charles A. Barragato

Stony Brook University ( email )

303 Harriman Hall
Stony Brook, NY 11794
United States
631-632-7999 (Phone)
631-632-9412 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
3,041
PlumX Metrics