Are Athletes Doped? Some Theoretical Arguments and Empirical Evidence
12 Pages Posted: 4 Nov 2007
Abstract
Sports fans all over the world have recently witnessed an increasing number of spectacular doping cases, leading to considerable annoyance in the public. However, our knowledge regarding the prevalence of doping is still quite limited, leading some people to speculate that (nearly) all professional athletes are doped and possibly even have to be doped to be good enough to compete successfully in highly selective tournaments. On the other hand, particularly representatives of the sports associations pretend that since the number of positively tested athletes remains small, there are only a few "black sheep", while in general, the world of sport is clean and fair. In the recent past, a number of theoretical models have been developed that can be empirically tested, which, in the end, may lead to the formulation of policy recommendations (ranging from higher sanctions to legalizing doping). We review the more important models and present anecdotal as well as some quantitative empirical evidence on the prevalence as well as the determinants of doping.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
School Attendance and Child Labor - A Model of Collective Behavior
-
Tournaments and Multiple Productive Inputs: The Case of Performance Enhancing Drugs
-
Social Norms, Spatial Dependence, and Children's Activities: Evidence from India
-
The Effect of Village-Based Schools: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial in Afghanistan
By Dana Burde and Leigh L. Linden
-
The Effect of Village-Based Schools: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial in Afghanistan
By Dana Burde and Leigh L. Linden
-
Riding High - Success in Sports and the Rise of Doping Cultures
-
Suspicious Blood and Performance in Professional Cycling
By Tom Coupé and Olivier Gergaud