Citations (2)



Securities Mediation: Dispute Resolution for the Individual Investor

Jill Gross

Pace Law School

Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2006

This article examines the fairness of mediation of customers' disputes with their securities brokers and their brokerage firms. After a brief description of the history of alternative dispute resolution of customer disputes in the securities industry, including the rise of mediation in the 1990s, I examine the impact on individual investors of the various layers of regulation of the mediation process, including the federal securities laws and state mediation laws. I also reject a recent federal court's holding that the Federal Arbitration Act applies to mediation as an unwarranted expansion of the FAA. I then analyze the various dimensions of fairness of this dispute resolution method, including substantive and procedural justice, party choice, and achievement of non-legal objectives, and conclude that securities mediation is a fair method of dispute resolution for the individual investor, and is a viable alternative to arbitration. In sum, this article will contribute to the growing body of literature that considers the impact on investors of the securities industry's promotion of a diversity of methods to resolve customer disputes.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 54

Keywords: securities, mediation, alternative dispute resolution, investor rights

JEL Classification: K10, K22

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 2, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Gross, Jill, Securities Mediation: Dispute Resolution for the Individual Investor. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2006. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1026355

Contact Information

Jill Gross (Contact Author)
Pace Law School ( email )
78 North Broadway
White Plains, NY 10603
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,609
Downloads: 189
Download Rank: 126,412
Citations:  2