Foreign Capital and Economic Growth in the First Era of Globalization
54 Pages Posted: 5 Nov 2007 Last revised: 8 Aug 2010
Date Written: November 2007
Abstract
We explore the association between income and international capital flows between 1880 and 1913. Capital inflows are associated with higher incomes per capita in the long-run, but capital flows also brought income volatility via financial crises. Crises also decreased growth rates of income per capita significantly below trend for at least two years leading to important short term output losses. Countries just barely made up for these losses over time, so that there is no conditional long-run income loss or gain for countries that experienced crises. This is in contrast to the recent wave of globalization when capital importing countries that experienced a crisis seemed to grow relatively faster over fixed periods of time. We discuss some possibilities that can explain this finding.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN
Recommended Papers
-
Globalization and Capital Markets
By Maurice Obstfeld and Alan M. Taylor
-
The Gold Standard as a `Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval'
By Michael D. Bordo and Hugh Rockoff
-
Crises Now and then: What Lessons from the Last Era of Financial Globalization
-
The Great Depression as a Watershed: International Capital Mobility Over the Long Run
By Maurice Obstfeld and Alan M. Taylor
-
Currency Mismatches, Debt Intolerance and Original Sin: Why They are Not the Same and Why it Matters
By Barry Eichengreen, Ricardo Hausmann, ...
-
Emerging Market Spreads: Then Versus Now
By Yishay Yafeh, Nathan Sussman, ...
-
Emerging Market Spreads: Then Versus Now
By Paolo Mauro, Nathan Sussman, ...
-
Emerging Market Spreads: Then Versus Now
By Paolo Mauro, Nathan Sussman, ...
-
By Michael D. Bordo and Finn Kydland
-
Sovereign Risk, Credibility and the Gold Standard: 1870-1913 Versus 1925-31
By Maurice Obstfeld and Alan M. Taylor
