On Clarifying Terms in Applied Ethics Discourse: Suicide, Assisted Suicide, and Euthanasia

International Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 351-358, September 2003

8 Pages Posted: 12 Nov 2007

See all articles by Craig Paterson

Craig Paterson

Independent Scholar; Complutense - Faculty of Information Sciences

Abstract

All too often in applied ethics debates, there is a danger that a lack of analytical clarity and precision in the use of key terms serves to cloud and confuse the real nature of the debate being undertaken. A particular area of concern in my analysis of the bioethics literature has been the uses to which the key terms "suicide," "assisted suicide," and "euthanasia" are put. The modest aim of this article is to render a contribution to the applied ethics debate on these topics by seeking to delimit the scope and meaning of these terms. The criteria of specificity, non-arbitrariness, consistency (between various terms), and the avoidance of strong pejorative presuppositions, supply the main standards guiding my adoption of usages.

Keywords: Suicide, Assisted Suicide, Euthanasia, PAS, Applied Ethics, Intention

Suggested Citation

Paterson, Craig, On Clarifying Terms in Applied Ethics Discourse: Suicide, Assisted Suicide, and Euthanasia. International Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 351-358, September 2003. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1029224

Craig Paterson (Contact Author)

Independent Scholar ( email )

Topanga, CA 90290

Complutense - Faculty of Information Sciences ( email )

Carretera de Humera s/n
Madrid, Madrid 28223
Spain

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
330
Abstract Views
1,931
rank
91,610
PlumX Metrics