How Relevant is Targeting to the Success of an Antipoverty Program?
34 Pages Posted: 20 Apr 2016
There are 2 versions of this paper
How Relevant is Targeting to the Success of an Antipoverty Program?
How Relevant is Targeting to the Success of an Antipoverty Program?
Date Written: November 1, 2007
Abstract
Policy-oriented discussions often assume that "better targeting" implies larger impacts on poverty or more cost-effective interventions. The literature on the economics of targeting warns against that assumption, but evidence has been scarce. The paper begins with a critical review of the strengths and weaknesses of the targeting measures found in practice. It then exploits an unusually large micro data set for China to estimate aggregate and local-level poverty impacts of the country's main urban antipoverty program. Standard measures of targeting are found to be uninformative, or even deceptive, about impacts on poverty and cost-effectiveness in reducing poverty. In program design and evaluation, it would be better to focus directly on the program's outcomes for poor people than to rely on prevailing measures of targeting.
Keywords: Services & Transfers to Poor, Poverty Monitoring & Analysis, Population Policies, Poverty Impact Evaluation, Poverty Reduction Strategies
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Is a Guaranteed Living Wage a Good Anti-Poverty Policy?
By Rinku Murgai and Martin Ravallion
-
Local Electoral Incentives and Decentralized Program Performance
By Alain De Janvry, Frederico Finan, ...
-
Di Bao: A Guaranteed Minimum Income in Urban China?
By Shaohua Chen, Martin Ravallion, ...