References (38)


Citations (2)



Alive and Kicking: Collusion Theories in Merger Analysis at the Federal Trade Commission

Malcolm B. Coate

U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC)

January 1, 2008

This paper explores the use of collusion theories in merger analysis at the Federal Trade Commission. The 1992 Merger Guidelines focuses on unilateral effect, relegating collusion analysis to a second tier theory. Both structural and behavioral conditions conducive to establishing or maintaining an arrangement to restrict competition are listed in the Guidelines. This paper undertakes a systematic review of 75 merger decisions filed between 1993 and 2005 to identify the conditions that are found to increase the likelihood of a collusion finding. Standard structural concerns are readily identified, while behavioral factors defy characterization. Instead, the analysis seems to develop a Folk Theorem in which structural concerns are validated with some type of performance evidence. Further work finds allegations of maverick conduct add little to the analysis, while the Bush administration appears slightly more likely to identify a collusion problem than the Clinton regulators.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 44

Keywords: merger, oligopoly, coordinated interaction, Federal Trade Commission, merger guidelines, maverick

JEL Classification: K21, L13, L40

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 15, 2007 ; Last revised: January 25, 2008

Suggested Citation

Coate, Malcolm B., Alive and Kicking: Collusion Theories in Merger Analysis at the Federal Trade Commission (January 1, 2008). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1030067 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1030067

Contact Information

Malcolm B. Coate (Contact Author)
U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) ( email )
601 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20580
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,309
Downloads: 282
Download Rank: 80,762
References:  38
Citations:  2