Global Development and Environment Institute Working Paper No. 07-03
17 Pages Posted: 15 Nov 2007 Last revised: 12 May 2008
Date Written: October 2007
A number of recent discussions about ethical issues in climate change, as engaged in by economists, have focused on the value of the parameter representing the rate of time preference within models of optimal growth. This essay examines many economists' antipathy to serious discussion of ethical matters, and suggests that the avoidance of questions of intergenerational equity is related to another set of value judgments concerning the quality and objectivity of economic practice. Using insights from feminist philosophy of science and research on high reliability organizations, this essay argues that a more ethically transparent, real-world-oriented, and flexible economic practice would lead to more strongly objective, reliable, and useful knowledge.
Keywords: ethics, environment, methodology, feminist economics, climate change, intergenerational equity, optimal growth models, discount rate, high-reliability organizations
JEL Classification: A12, A13, B4, D9, Q3
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Nelson, Julie A., Economists, Value Judgments, and Climate Change: A View from Feminist Economics (October 2007). ; Ecological Economics, Vol. 65, No. 3, 2008. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1030106