Footnotes (335)



Constitutional Evidence Law

Alex Stein

Brooklyn Law School

Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 61, 2008
Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 207

This Article identifies the causes and consequences of a puzzling asymmetry in constitutional law. Of the three facets of adjudicative fact-finding - evidence, procedure, and rules of decision - only two are constitutionalized. Constitutional law regulates procedural and decisional rules - not whether the evidence that fact-finders use is adequate. Allocation of the risk of error by procedures and decisional rules - formulated as burdens of proof - is subject to constitutional scrutiny. Allocation of the risk of error by the rules of evidential adequacy, however, is free from that scrutiny. This constitutional asymmetry is puzzling because all risk-allocation impacts court decisions and, consequently, whether a person is deprived erroneously of her liberty or property. This Article explains this asymmetry in the informal constitutionalization of evidence - a phenomenon that implicates three dynamics of power and culture. First, state evidence rules generally align with the Supreme Court's agenda for risk-allocation. Second, when those rules do deviate from the Court's agenda to promote local interests, they do not do so overtly. Finally, a state rule's alignment with a federal rule of evidence guarantees its constitutionality. This informal order reflects a series of implicit, but credible understandings between state courts and the Supreme Court. This Article identifies and illustrates these understandings.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 62

Keywords: evidence, constitution, due process, trials, burden of proof, risk of error

JEL Classification: K00, K10, K41

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 19, 2007 ; Last revised: September 28, 2011

Suggested Citation

Stein, Alex, Constitutional Evidence Law. Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 61, 2008; Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 207. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1031153

Contact Information

Alex Stein (Contact Author)
Brooklyn Law School ( email )
250 Joralemon Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States
718-780-0615 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,623
Downloads: 289
Download Rank: 78,605
Footnotes:  335