Psychological Aspects of Retributive Justice
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, M. P. Zanna, ed., Vol. 40, pp. 193-236, San Diego, CA, Elsevier, 2008
44 Pages Posted: 20 Nov 2007 Last revised: 7 Sep 2008
Retributive justice is a system by which offenders are punished in proportion to the moral magnitude of their intentionally committed harms. This chapter lays out the emerging psychological principles that underlie citizens' intuitions regarding punishment. We rely on experimental methods and conclude that intuitions of justice are broadly consistent with the principles of retributive justice, and therefore systematically deviate from principles of deterrence and other utilitarian based systems of punishing wrongs. We examine the recent contributions of social-neuroscience to the topic and conclude that retributive punishment judgments normally stem from the more general intuitive-based judgment system. Particular circumstances can trigger the reasoning-based system, however, thus indicating that this is a dual process mechanism. Importantly, though, evidence suggests that both the intuitive and reasoning systems adhere to the principles of retribution.
The empirical results of this research have clear policy implications. Converging evidence suggests that the formal U.S. justice system is becoming increasingly utilitarian in nature, but that citizen intuitions about justice continue to track retributive principles. The resulting divide leads people to lose respect for the law, which means that they do not rely on the law's guidance in ambiguous situations where the morally correct behavior is unclear. These are the dangers to society from having justice policies based jointly on the contradictory principles of retribution and utility, and we lay out an argument for enacting public policies more exclusively based on retributive principles of justice.
Keywords: retribution, justice, psychology, law
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
On Justifying Punishment: The Discrepancy between Words and Actions
The Ex Ante Function of the Criminal Law
By John M. Darley, Kevin M. Carlsmith, ...
The Fine Line between Interrogation and Retribution
'Just for Fun': Understanding Torture and Understanding Abu Ghraib
The Function of Punishment in the 'Civil' Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators
By Kevin M. Carlsmith, John Monahan, ...
The Paradoxical Consequences of Revenge
By Kevin M. Carlsmith, Timothy Wilson, ...
Meeting Violence with Violence: The Connection between Retributive Justice and Interstate Conflict
By Rachel Stein
War and Torture as 'Just Deserts'