25 Pages Posted: 20 Nov 2007
Whether natural resources are good or bad for a country's development are shown to depend on the interaction between institutional setting and, crucially, the types of resources possessed by the country. Some natural resources are, for economical and technical reasons, more likely to cause problems such as rent-seeking and conflicts than others. This potential problem can, however, be countered by good institutional quality. In contrast to the traditional resource curse hypothesis, we show the impact of natural resources on economic growth to be non-monotonic in institutional quality, and increasingly so for certain types of resources. In particular, countries rich in minerals are cursed only if they have low-quality institutions, while the curse is reversed if institutions are sufficiently good. Furthermore, if countries are rich in diamonds and precious metals, these effects both positive and negative are larger.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Boschini, Anne and Pettersson, Jan and Roine, Jesper, Resource Curse or Not: A Question of Appropriability. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 109, No. 3, pp. 593-617, September 2007. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1031542 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2007.00509.x
This is a Wiley-Blackwell Publishing paper. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing charges $38.00 .
File name: sjoe.
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.