Footnotes (287)



Protecting Children Against Unnecessary Institutionalization

Alexander Tsesis

Loyola University Chicago School of Law

South Texas Law Review, Vol. 39, No. 995, 1998

I argue in this article that children should not be confined to mental institutions without first being afforded the right to intermediate judicial scrutiny under the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. First, I discuss how some judicial decisions have determined what procedural rights children have under the United States Constitution. I primarily focus on the key Supreme Court decision, Parham v. J.R., about the mental institutionalization of children. Secondly, I consider the degree to which juveniles in mental institutions are deprived of their liberty and evaluate the reliability of psychiatric diagnoses of children. Finally, I present a perspective on the reasons behind the increase in juvenile commitment and what legal steps should be taken to curb abuse of the juvenile mental health system.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: mental health, children, mental institutionalization, institutionalization, juvenile, adolescent, mental illness, Szasz, Parham v. J.R., due process, intermediate scrutiny

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 21, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Tsesis, Alexander, Protecting Children Against Unnecessary Institutionalization. South Texas Law Review, Vol. 39, No. 995, 1998. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1031713

Contact Information

Alexander Tsesis (Contact Author)
Loyola University Chicago School of Law ( email )
25 E. Pearson
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
312-915-7929 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,454
Downloads: 121
Download Rank: 184,225
Footnotes:  287