Finding Effective Constraints on Executive Power: Interrogation, Detention, and Torture

43 Pages Posted: 22 Nov 2007

See all articles by Deborah N. Pearlstein

Deborah N. Pearlstein

Princeton University - Program in Law & Public Policy

Abstract

U.S. practices of coercive interrogation and torture since 2002 have called into question the efficacy of traditional structural constraints on executive power. Few dispute that the most egregious abuse of detainees in U.S. custody was unlawful, yet neither congressional oversight nor law-making functioned to check such treatment. This Article first considers why and how torture and abuse became such a pervasive problem post-9/11 despite affirmative laws prohibiting them. It then argues that the tools that were at all effective in checking executive power emerged from less classically "democratic" sources: a highly professionalized military and intelligence community; the media and organizations of non-governmental civil society; and actively engaged courts. While it is true that core democratic structures (particularly congressional oversight) failed to constrain executive operations in prisoner detention and treatment, these other levers of power saw at least modest success in changing the course of executive policy.

Suggested Citation

Pearlstein, Deborah N., Finding Effective Constraints on Executive Power: Interrogation, Detention, and Torture. Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 81, 2006, Princeton Law and Public Affairs Working Paper No. 07-007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1031768

Deborah N. Pearlstein (Contact Author)

Princeton University - Program in Law & Public Policy ( email )

Wallace Hall
Princeton, NJ 08544
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
256
Abstract Views
2,132
Rank
226,609
PlumX Metrics