'Yes Men,' Integrity, and the Optimal Design of Incentive Contracts
17 Pages Posted: 25 Nov 2007
Abstract
In a pioneering approach towards the explanation of the phenomenon of 'yes man' behavior in organizations, Prendergast (1993) argued that incentive contracts in employment relationships generally make a worker distort his privately acquired information. This would imply that there is a trade-off between inducing a worker to exert costly effort and inducing him to tell the truth. In contrast, we show that with optimally designed contracts, which we term integrity contracts, the worker will both exert effort and report his information truthfully, and that hence the first best can be achieved.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Simple Contracts, Renegotiation Under Asymmetric Information, and the Hold-Up Problem
-
Cadillac Contracts and Up-Front Payments: Efficient Investment Under Expectation Damages
-
Allocating Control in Agency Problems with Limited Liability and Sequential Hidden Actions
-
Allocating Control in Agency Problems with Limited Liability and Sequential Hidden Actions
-
On the Interplay of Hidden Action and Hidden Information in Simple Bilateral Trading Problems
-
The Hold-Up Problem and Incomplete Contracts: A Survey of Recent Topics in Contract Theory
-
Incomplete Contracts, the Hold-Up Problem and Asymmetric Information
-
Information Gathering, Transaction Costs and the Property Rights Approach
-
Information Gathering, Transaction Costs, and the Property Rights Approach