Exclusive Versus Non-Exclusive Licensing Strategies and Moral Hazard
13 Pages Posted: 26 Nov 2007
There are 2 versions of this paper
Exclusive Versus Non-Exclusive Licensing Strategies and Moral Hazard
Exclusive versus Non-Exclusive Licensing Strategies and Moral Hazard
Abstract
A patentee has invented a new technology. There are two downstream firms that might successfully develop a marketable product based on the new technology. The probability with which a downstream firm is successful in developing the product depends on its effort level. There are situations in which two licenses are sold if effort is a hidden action, while one exclusive license is provided if effort is verifiable. Moral hazard may thus increase the probability that the product will be developed. Methodologically, the concept of "virtual costs" is used in a moral hazard framework, demonstrating the analogy to adverse selection models.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
150 Years of Patent Protection
By Josh Lerner
-
150 Years of Patent Protection
By Josh Lerner
-
Patent Protection and Innovation Over 150 Years
By Josh Lerner
-
150 Years of Patent Office Practice
By Josh Lerner
-
150 Years of Patent Office Practice
By Josh Lerner
-
How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation? Evidence from Nineteenth-Century World Fairs
By Petra Moser
-
How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation?
By Petra Moser
-
By Lee Branstetter, Raymond J. Fisman, ...
-
By Lee Branstetter, Raymond J. Fisman, ...
-
Innovation Without Patents - Evidence from the World Fairs
By Petra Moser