The Joint Use of Regulation and Strict Liability with Multidimensional Care and Uncertain Conviction
35 Pages Posted: 27 Nov 2007
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore the joint use of regulation and strict liability when firms can take care in both observable and unobservable dimensions and when the firm's conviction for damages is uncertain. Much of the literature concerning joint use regards management of the judgment-proof problem; the take-home result of our paper is that if the harming party can take both observable and unobservable care, then joint use can improve welfare even in the absence of judgment-proofness. This is true even when penalty multipliers are allowed, provided social welfare is negatively related to the firm's expected liability costs. In fact, use of penalty multipliers further strengthens the case for joint use.
Keywords: Strict Liability, Regulation, Joint Use, Penalty Multipliers, Judgment Proof Problem
JEL Classification: K13, K32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Modeling the Choice between Regulation and Liability in Terms of Social Welfare
By Marcel Boyer and Donatella Porrini
-
Judgment Proofness Under Four Different Precaution Technologies
-
The Limitations of Legal Institutions for Addressing Environmental Risks
-
Soft Negligence and Cause in Fact: A Comment on Ganuza and Gomez
-
The Public Management of Environmental Risk: Separating Ex Ante and Ex Post Monitors
By Jérôme Pouyet, Yolande Hiriart, ...
-
The Public Management of Environmental Risk: Separating Ex Ante and Ex Post Monitors
By Yolande Hiriart, David Martimort, ...