Competing Complements
49 Pages Posted: 27 Nov 2007
Date Written: November 2007
Abstract
In Cournot's model of complements, the producers of A and B are both monopolists. This paper extends Cournot's model to allow for competition between complements on one side of the market. Consider two complements, A and B, where the A + B bundle is valuable only when purchased together. Good A is supplied by a monopolist (e.g., Microsoft) and there is competition in the B goods from vertically differentiated suppliers (e.g., Intel and AMD). In this simple game, there may not be a pure-strategy equilibria. In the standard case where marginal costs are weakly positive, there is no pure strategy where the lower quality B firm obtains positive market share. We also consider the case where A has negative marginal costs, as would arise when A can expect to make upgrade sales to an installed base. When profits from the installed base are sufficiently large, a pure strategy equilibrium exists with two B firms active in the market. Although there is competition in the complement market, the monopoly firm A may earn lower profits in this environment. Consequently, A may prefer to accept lower future profits in order to interact with a monopolist complement in B.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Strategic Use of Tying to Preserve and Create Market Power in Evolving Industries
By Dennis W. Carlton and Michael Waldman
-
Innovation, Rent Extraction, and Integration in Systems Markets
By Joseph Farrell and Michael L. Katz
-
Bundling and Competition on the Internet
By Yannis Bakos and Erik Brynjolfsson
-
Vertical Foreclosure with the Choice of Input Specifications
By Jay Pil Choi and Sang-seung Yi
-
Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design
-
Tying and Innovation: A Dynamic Analysis of Tying Arrangements
By Jay Pil Choi
-
An Economist's Guide to U.S. V Microsoft
By Richard Gilbert and Michael L. Katz