The WTO, Science, and the Environment: Moving Towards Consistency

Posted: 27 Nov 2007

See all articles by Andrew James Green

Andrew James Green

University of Toronto - Faculty of Law

Tracey D. Epps

Chapman Tripp

Abstract

Governments are increasingly using taxes to address a variety of environmental concerns. WTO rules recognize that, like regulatory instruments, governments may use taxes for protectionist purposes. The rules are designed to prevent protectionist behaviour while allowing use of such instruments for genuine purposes such as environmental protection. Interestingly, however, there are some notable anomalies in the rules arising from differential evidentiary requirements in different situations. First, the rules are different depending upon whether a country's measure aims to protect on one hand human, animal, or plant health; or on the other, the environment. Second, the rules are stricter where a country's measure takes the form of a regulation than where it takes the form of a tax. The article argues that there is no principled rationale for the differential evidentiary requirements by instrument (regulation versus taxes) or area (health versus environment) but finds that there may be both a historical and political economy explanation. It also discusses the desirability for consistency in WTO law across instruments and risk-related policy areas.

Keywords: International Trade, environmental law, health and safety

Suggested Citation

Green, Andrew James and Epps, Tracey D., The WTO, Science, and the Environment: Moving Towards Consistency. Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 285-316, 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1032940

Andrew James Green (Contact Author)

University of Toronto - Faculty of Law ( email )

84 Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C5
Canada

Tracey D. Epps

Chapman Tripp

Auckland
New Zealand

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
673
PlumX Metrics