The Quality and Price of Investment Banks' Service: Evidence from the PIPE Market
Financial Management, Forthcoming
48 Pages Posted: 2 Dec 2007 Last revised: 8 Nov 2009
Date Written: July 14, 2009
Abstract
We investigate the market structure and the pricing by placement agents of private investments in public equities (PIPEs). Our findings indicate that more reputable agents are associated with larger offers and with firms possessing lower risk. Agent reputation is positively associated with lower discounts and an enhanced post-PIPE trading environment. Issuers pay a higher dollar fee for these benefits, although more reputable agents charge a lower percentage fee. The evidence suggests that it is the quality of the issuing firm, and the pricing and reputational concern of the placement agent that drives the equilibrium in the PIPE market.
Keywords: Investment bank, private investment in public equity (PIPE)
JEL Classification: G24, G32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Financing Under Extreme Risk: Contract Terms and Returns to Private Investments in Public Equity
By Susan Chaplinsky and David Haushalter
-
Does Investor Identity Matter in Equity Issues? Evidence from Private Placements
By Srinivasan Krishnamurthy, Paul A. Spindt, ...
-
By Na Dai
-
The Choice of Equity Selling Mechanisms: PIPES versus SEOS
By Hsuan‐chi Chen, Na Dai, ...
-
By Kimberly C. Gleason, Ravi Jain, ...
-
By Karen H. Wruck and Yilin Wu
-
By Ioannis V. Floros and Kuldeep Shastri
-
Blank Check IPOs: A Home Run for Management
By Vijay M. Jog and Chengye Sun