Why Do Corporations Become Criminals? Ownership, Hidden Actions, and Crime as an Agency Cost
37 Pages Posted: 16 Jun 1997 Last revised: 19 Nov 2012
Abstract
We examine the relationship between ownership structure and corporate crime. Our approach draws upon two lines of research: (1) the theory of the firm which poses ownership as a critical incentive mechanism and (2) the economic theory of corporate crime, which emphasizes the role played by top management in affecting crime in the corporation. We find that crime occurs less frequently among firms in which management has a larger ownership stake. Our results imply that penalizing "corporations" (shareholders) deters crime, and that corporate crime tends not to benefit shareholders, ex ante. Rather than being something shareholders have encouraged, corporate crime appears to reflect an agency cost limited but not optimally eliminated through the costly efforts of top management. The evidence is consistent with the notion that ownership structure plays an important role in aligning the hidden actions of top management with the shareholder interest.
JEL Classification: G32, G38, K14, K22
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Cost to Firms of Cooking the Books
By Jonathan M. Karpoff, D. Scott Lee, ...
-
The Consequences to Managers for Financial Misrepresentation
By Jonathan M. Karpoff, D. Scott Lee, ...
-
Defense Procurement: Fraud, Penalties, and Contractor Influence
By Jonathan M. Karpoff, D. Scott Lee, ...
-
On the Nature of the Reputational Penalty for Corporate Crime: Evidence
-
Shareholder Initiated Class Action Lawsuits: Shareholder Wealth Effects and Industry Spillovers
By Amar Gande and Craig M. Lewis
-
The Legal Penalties for Financial Misrepresentation
By Jonathan M. Karpoff, D. Scott Lee, ...
-
By Anup Agrawal and Tommy Cooper
-
Securities Class Actions, Corporate Governance and Managerial Agency Problems