37 Pages Posted: 16 Jun 1997 Last revised: 19 Nov 2012
We examine the relationship between ownership structure and corporate crime. Our approach draws upon two lines of research: (1) the theory of the firm which poses ownership as a critical incentive mechanism and (2) the economic theory of corporate crime, which emphasizes the role played by top management in affecting crime in the corporation. We find that crime occurs less frequently among firms in which management has a larger ownership stake. Our results imply that penalizing "corporations" (shareholders) deters crime, and that corporate crime tends not to benefit shareholders, ex ante. Rather than being something shareholders have encouraged, corporate crime appears to reflect an agency cost limited but not optimally eliminated through the costly efforts of top management. The evidence is consistent with the notion that ownership structure plays an important role in aligning the hidden actions of top management with the shareholder interest.
JEL Classification: G32, G38, K14, K22
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Alexander, Cindy R. and Cohen, Mark A., Why Do Corporations Become Criminals? Ownership, Hidden Actions, and Crime as an Agency Cost. Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 5, 1999. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=10474