Growth and Governance: Models, Measures, and Mechanisms

17 Pages Posted: 11 Dec 2007

See all articles by Marcus J. Kurtz

Marcus J. Kurtz

Ohio State University (OSU) - Department of Political Science

Andrew Schrank

University of New Mexico - Department of Sociology

Abstract

The regnant scholarly consensus linking good governance - the quality of public administration - to economic development has undergone surprisingly little empirical scrutiny. We examine the relationship by asking two questions: How confident are we in our cross-national measures of good governance? How solid are the empirical foundations of the growth-governance causal linkage? Our results suggest that the dominant measures of governance are problematic, suffering from perceptual biases, adverse selection in sampling, and conceptual conflation with economic policy choices. Within the limits of somewhat problematic measures, the evidence suggests that there is far more reason to believe that growth and development spur improvements in governance than vice versa. The policy implications are profound, for international organizations and governments are beginning to condition developmental aid on problematic measures of administrative performance.

Suggested Citation

Kurtz, Marcus and Schrank, Andrew, Growth and Governance: Models, Measures, and Mechanisms. Journal of Politics, Vol. 69, No. 2, pp. 538-554, May 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1065965 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00549.x

Marcus Kurtz (Contact Author)

Ohio State University (OSU) - Department of Political Science ( email )

Columbus, OH 43210
United States

Andrew Schrank

University of New Mexico - Department of Sociology ( email )

Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
10
Abstract Views
1,450
PlumX Metrics