Able But Not Willing: The Failure of Mutual Fund Advisers to Advocate for Shareholders' Rights
51 Pages Posted: 13 Apr 2011
Date Written: March 31, 2009
This paper is both empirical and conceptual. First, it examines how investment advisers to large mutual fund families cast proxy votes on shareholder-sponsored, corporate governance resolutions. It links the amount of assets the Adviser managed at defined contribution (DC) retirement plans as of year-end 2005 to the overall percentage of proxies it cast in favor of 11 key categories of governance proposals at US-listed corporations during the 2006 proxy season. For the ten largest fund families, the amount of DC assets under management by the Adviser is negatively correlated with support for shareholder governance resolutions. This supports prior research findings that Advisers who have important business interests in the DC channel place those interests in asset gathering ahead of their fiduciary duties. This paper recognizes that Advisers to mutual funds are just one of the many intermediaries who stand between the underlying, risk-taking investor and the corporate managers who control the investor's capital. Accordingly, this paper explores how investors who are many links away from the corporations in which they place their money at risk may be empowered. Among the suggestions is to borrow from British reforms by creating a uniform set of best practices for corporate governance. Fund Advisers would be required to report and justify any departure from casting proxy votes (related to management or shareholder proposals) in line with best practices. Ideally, this comply or explain practice would be inserted at each link of the intermediation chain - from the corporation all the way to the underlying investor.
Keywords: mutual funds, corporate governance, proxy voting, shareholder resolutions, retirement plans, conflict-of-interest
JEL Classification: K22, M14, G23, G18
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Corporate Governance and Shareholder Initiatives: Empirical Evidence
By Jonathan M. Karpoff, Paul H. Malatesta, ...
Shareholder Passivity Reexamined
The Impact of Shareholder Activism on Target Companies: A Survey of Empirical Findings
Shareholder Activism and Corporate Governance in the United States
The Motivation and Impact of Pension Fund Activism
Monitoring: Which Institutions Matter?
By Kai Li, Jarrad Harford, ...
Hedge Fund Activism, Corporate Governance, and Firm Performance
Does Coordinated Institutional Activism Work? An Analysis of the Activities of the Council of Institutional Investors
By Tim C. Opler and Jonathan S. Sokobin
The Evolution of Shareholder Activism in the United States
By Stuart Gillan and Laura T. Starks
The Case for Increasing Shareholder Power