Do State Laws Affect the Age of Marriage? a Cautionary Tale About Avoidance Behavior
49 Pages Posted: 19 Dec 2007 Last revised: 6 Nov 2022
Date Written: December 2007
Abstract
This paper investigates the response of young people in the United States to state laws dictating the minimum age at which individuals could marry, with and without parental consent. We use variation across states and over time to document behavioral responses to laws governing the age of marriage using both administrative records from the Vital Statistics and retrospective reports from the U.S. Census. We find evidence that state laws delayed the marriages of some young people, but the effects are much smaller in Census data than in Vital Statistics records. This discrepancy appears to be driven by systematic avoidance behavior of two kinds. First, some young people marry outside their state of residence, in states with less restrictive laws. Second, many young people appear to have evaded minimum age of marriage laws by misrepresenting age on their marriage certificate. This avoidance was especially pronounced in earlier years, when few states required documented proof of age and when there was greater gain to marrying out of state because of wider variation in laws. Our results have important implications about the quality of administrative data when it is poorly monitored; about the effect of laws when agents can avoid them; and about the validly of estimates using cross-state variation in laws as an instrumental variable. By contrasting two data sources, we achieve a more complete picture of behavioral response than would be possible with either one alone.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Using Electoral Cycles in Police Hiring to Estimate the Effect of Policeon Crime
-
The Effect of Education on Crime: Evidence from Prison Inmates, Arrests, and Self-Reports
By Lance Lochner and Enrico Moretti
-
The Effect of Prison Population Size on Crime Rates: Evidence from Prison Overcrowding Litigation