Market Efficiency and the Returns to Technical Analysis

Financial Management, Vol 27, No 2

Posted: 21 Aug 1998

See all articles by Hendrik Bessembinder

Hendrik Bessembinder

Arizona State University; W.P. Carey School of Business

Kalok Chan

CUHK Business School

Abstract

We further investigate and provide interpretation for the intriguing Brock, Lakonishok, and LeBaron (1992) finding that simple forms of technical analysis contain significant forecast power for US equity index returns. We document that the forecast ability is partially, but not solely, attributable to return measurement errors arising from nonsynchronous trading. We argue that the evidence supporting technical forecast power need not be inconsistent with market efficiency. "Break-even" one-way trading costs are computed to be 0.39% for the full sample and 0.22% since 1975, which are small compared to recent estimates of actual trading costs. Further, we test but fail to reject a key restriction that most equilibrium models place on return forecast ability: that the technical rules should not reliably identify periods of negative market risk premia.

JEL Classification: G12, G14

Suggested Citation

Bessembinder, Hendrik (Hank) and Chan, Kalok, Market Efficiency and the Returns to Technical Analysis. Financial Management, Vol 27, No 2, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=107672

Hendrik (Hank) Bessembinder (Contact Author)

Arizona State University ( email )

PO Box 873906
Tempe, AZ 85207
United States

W.P. Carey School of Business ( email )

W. P. Carey School of Business
PO Box 873906
Tempe, AZ 85287-3906
United States

HOME PAGE: http://https://wpcarey.asu.edu/people/profile/2717225

Kalok Chan

CUHK Business School ( email )

Hong Kong
852 3943 9988 (Phone)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
4,018
PlumX Metrics