Bilateral versus Multilateral Free Trade Agreements: A Welfare Analysis

35 Pages Posted: 27 Dec 2007 Last revised: 17 Sep 2012

Demet Yilmazkuday

Florida International University

Hakan Yilmazkuday

Florida International University (FIU) - Department of Economics

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: September 16, 2012

Abstract

Why do we observe proliferation of bilateral free trade agreements (FTAs) between certain types of countries instead of having progress in attaining global free trade through a multilateral FTA? We answer this question by exploring the enforceability of different types of FTAs through comparing minimum discount factors that are necessary to sustain them in an infinitely repeated game framework. We also search for the globally welfare maximizing trade agreements that are sustainable under different conditions. The results depict that transportation costs, differences in country sizes and comparative advantages are all obstacles for having a multilateral FTA. Accordingly, we suggest that international policies conducted for the removal of such obstacles should be the main goal toward achieving a multilateral FTA, which we show to be the first-best solution to the maximization problem of global welfare.

Keywords: Free Trade Agreements, Self-Enforcing Rules, Transportation Costs, Country Size, Comparative Advantage, Repeated Game

JEL Classification: C72, C73, D60, F15

Suggested Citation

Yilmazkuday, Demet and Yilmazkuday, Hakan, Bilateral versus Multilateral Free Trade Agreements: A Welfare Analysis (September 16, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1078741 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1078741

Demet Yilmazkuday

Florida International University ( email )

Miami, FL 33199
United States

Hakan Yilmazkuday (Contact Author)

Florida International University (FIU) - Department of Economics ( email )

11200 SW 8th Street
Miami, FL 33199
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
439
Rank
52,439
Abstract Views
2,677