The Other Patent Agency: Congressional Regulation of the ITC

52 Pages Posted: 28 May 2008 Last revised: 5 Dec 2014

See all articles by Sapna Kumar

Sapna Kumar

University of Houston Law Center

Date Written: September 1, 2009

Abstract

The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has recently experienced a dramatic increase in patent infringement investigations under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Patent holders are drawn to the agency because of its speedy proceedings and its ability to award broad exclusion orders. This rise in ITC patent litigation, however, has revealed weaknesses in the structure of Section 337. In broadening the provision to facilitate the enforcement of patent rights, Congress failed to consider the impact of this change on technological innovation and on the coherency of the patent system. In particular, Congress did not clarify the relationship between Section 337 and the Patent Act, leading to divergence in the law. Nor did it consider the effect that patent-related exclusion orders would have on innovation and on strategic behavior. This article recommends that Congress harmonize ITC patent law with the Patent Act and related federal precedent. It furthermore suggests that Congress take a unified approach to promoting innovation in the patent system.

Keywords: ITC, international trade commission, trade

Suggested Citation

Kumar, Sapna, The Other Patent Agency: Congressional Regulation of the ITC (September 1, 2009). Florida Law Review, Vol. 61, No. 3, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1082894 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1082894

Sapna Kumar (Contact Author)

University of Houston Law Center ( email )

4604 Calhoun Road
Houston, TX 77204-6060
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.uh.edu/faculty/main.asp?PID=4715

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
367
Abstract Views
2,443
rank
88,348
PlumX Metrics