The Other Patent Agency: Congressional Regulation of the ITC

52 Pages Posted: 28 May 2008 Last revised: 5 Dec 2014

See all articles by Sapna Kumar

Sapna Kumar

University of Minnesota Law School

Date Written: September 1, 2009


The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has recently experienced a dramatic increase in patent infringement investigations under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Patent holders are drawn to the agency because of its speedy proceedings and its ability to award broad exclusion orders. This rise in ITC patent litigation, however, has revealed weaknesses in the structure of Section 337. In broadening the provision to facilitate the enforcement of patent rights, Congress failed to consider the impact of this change on technological innovation and on the coherency of the patent system. In particular, Congress did not clarify the relationship between Section 337 and the Patent Act, leading to divergence in the law. Nor did it consider the effect that patent-related exclusion orders would have on innovation and on strategic behavior. This article recommends that Congress harmonize ITC patent law with the Patent Act and related federal precedent. It furthermore suggests that Congress take a unified approach to promoting innovation in the patent system.

Keywords: ITC, international trade commission, trade

Suggested Citation

Kumar, Sapna, The Other Patent Agency: Congressional Regulation of the ITC (September 1, 2009). Florida Law Review, Vol. 61, No. 3, 2009, Available at SSRN: or

Sapna Kumar (Contact Author)

University of Minnesota Law School ( email )

United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics