Is Stern Review on Climate Change Alarmist?

Energy and Environment, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 521-532, 2007

4 Pages Posted: 16 Jan 2008 Last revised: 5 Oct 2009

See all articles by S. Niggol Seo

S. Niggol Seo

Muaebak Institute of Global Warming Studies

Date Written: 2007

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the conclusion of the Stern Review that the cost of climate change could be as much as 20% of the global GDP. In this paper, I identify two major sources of the variation in the estimates of the aggregate cost of climate change. One is the different climate change predictions of the AOGCM (Atmospheric Oceanic General Circulation Model) models, and the other is varying economic damage estimates. The main conclusion of this paper is that only under the alarmist approach- which assumes both the most severe climate change and the most extreme estimate of climate change damage to the economy- we can be convinced that the cost of climate change is close to 20% of the global GDP in 2100. In most other cases, the cost will be under 1% of the global GDP.

Keywords: UK Climate Policy, Stern Review, GCM predictions, Climate Change Impacts, and DICE model

JEL Classification: Q54

Suggested Citation

Seo, S. Niggol, Is Stern Review on Climate Change Alarmist? (2007). Energy and Environment, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 521-532, 2007 . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1083244

S. Niggol Seo (Contact Author)

Muaebak Institute of Global Warming Studies ( email )

Seorim-dong
Gwanak-gu
Seoul
Korea, Republic of (South Korea)

HOME PAGE: http://www.muaebakinstitute.org/s.niggol-seo.html

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
31
Abstract Views
535
PlumX Metrics