Making Citizens Smart: When Do Institutions Improve Unsophisticated Citizens' Decisions?

Political Behavior, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 287-306

39 Pages Posted: 17 Jan 2008 Last revised: 22 Jul 2009

Date Written: 2009

Abstract

Many scholars lament citizens’ lack of political sophistication, while others emphasize that information shortcuts can substitute for sophistication and help citizens with their political choices. In this paper, I use experiments to assess whether and under what conditions institutions can substitute for sophistication and enable even unsophisticated citizens to make informed decisions. The results of my experiments demonstrate that institutions, such as a penalty for lying or a threat of verification, can help both sophisticated and unsophisticated citizens to make informed decisions. Further, my results suggest that institutions may, under certain conditions, level the playing field between sophisticated and unsophisticated citizens.

Keywords: voter, trust, institution, decision-making, sophistication, experiment, learning, penalty

JEL Classification: C90, C91, D72, D80, D81, D83

Suggested Citation

Boudreau, Cheryl, Making Citizens Smart: When Do Institutions Improve Unsophisticated Citizens' Decisions? (2009). Political Behavior, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 287-306, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1084712

Cheryl Boudreau (Contact Author)

University of California, Davis ( email )

One Shields Avenue
Apt 153
Davis, CA 95616
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
118
Abstract Views
2,008
Rank
425,167
PlumX Metrics