The Joint Hedging and Leverage Decision

51 Pages Posted: 21 Jan 2008 Last revised: 9 Sep 2009

See all articles by John Gould

John Gould

Curtin University

Alexander Szimayer

University of Hamburg - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration

Date Written: September 7, 2009

Abstract

This study’s modeling analysis indicates that optimal hedging and optimal leverage decisions are patently different if undertaken jointly than when undertaken in isolation. The most striking result is that the optimal joint hedging and leverage strategy entails reduced hedging for a weak price outcome for production output. This risk-seeking behavior does not have a classic asset substitution impetus because, by set-up, the debt-holders are fairly compensated for the increased risk. Given a weak output price outcome, it is the presence of unhedgeable risk that makes the operational benefit of a subsequent output price rise vulnerable to the financial risk posed by leverage and the fact that the hedge portfolio would lose value; that is, an output price rebound actually entails adversely high risk of bankruptcy and consequential foregone profitable production. To counter this, some reduction of the overall hedge position increases the likelihood of avoiding bankruptcy in the event of an output price rebound.

Keywords: Hedging, Leverage, Financial Risk, Capital Structure

JEL Classification: G32, G33, G12

Suggested Citation

Gould, John and Szimayer, Alexander, The Joint Hedging and Leverage Decision (September 7, 2009). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1085964 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1085964

John Gould (Contact Author)

Curtin University ( email )

Bentley 6102 WA
Australia
+618 9266 9028 (Phone)

Alexander Szimayer

University of Hamburg - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration ( email )

Von-Melle-Park 5
Hamburg, 20146
Germany

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
223
Abstract Views
1,601
rank
163,319
PlumX Metrics