39 Pages Posted: 25 Jan 2008 Last revised: 14 Jul 2013
Date Written: March 2013
This paper develops a theory to explain the Easterlin Paradox, which holds that average happiness levels do not necessarily increase as countries grow wealthier, by analyzing the different roles of income and non-income factors in promoting happiness. Our theory shows that happiness rises with income only up to a critical point that is determined by the amount of non-income factors. Once the critical income level is achieved, increased income no longer buys more happiness, and so the only way to promote happiness is to improve non-income factors. As a policy implication, governments should promote balanced growth between income and non-income factors to maintain sustained happiness. The empirical analysis provides evidence supporting our theoretical predictions.
Keywords: Easterlin Paradox, income vs. non-income factors, happiness, social comparison
JEL Classification: D61, D62, H23
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Tian, Guoqiang and Wang, Xinli and Yang, Liyan, Balanced Growth: A Potential Resolution to the Easterlin Paradox (March 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1087403 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1087403