Overruling Erie: Nationwide Class Actions and National Common Law

8 Pages Posted: 27 Jan 2008

See all articles by Suzanna Sherry

Suzanna Sherry

Vanderbilt University - Law School

Abstract

In this essay, part of a symposium on the Class Action Fairness Act, I argue that CAFA should be read as having overruled Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins as applied to the nationwide class actions that fall within CAFA's jurisdictional grant. In the principal paper on which this essay comments, Linda Silberman suggests that Congress should overrule Klaxon v. Stentor Electric Mfg. Co. That suggestion, I propose, amounts to swimming halfway across a river. One of Congress's stated goals in enacting CAFA was to restore the intent of the founding generation. Examining the history and purposes of both diversity jurisdiction and the Rules of Decision Act demonstrates that unless CAFA is read to overrule Erie, it has achieved only half its goal.

Keywords: Erie, class actions, choice of law, CAFA

Suggested Citation

Sherry, Suzanna, Overruling Erie: Nationwide Class Actions and National Common Law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 156, No. 6, 2008; Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 08-02. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1087435

Suzanna Sherry (Contact Author)

Vanderbilt University - Law School ( email )

131 21st Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37203-1181
United States
615-322-0993 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
166
Abstract Views
1,053
rank
178,474
PlumX Metrics