Tempering the Commerce Power

Montana Law Review, Vol. 68, p. 97

34 Pages Posted: 31 Jan 2008

See all articles by Robert G. Natelson

Robert G. Natelson

Independence & Montana Policy Institutes


The Supreme Court's modern interpretation of the Necessary and Proper Clause in the realm of interstate commerce is textually problematic, unfaithful to the Constitution's original meaning, and contains positive incentives for Congress to over-regulate. The Necessary and Proper Clause was intended to embody the common law doctrine of principals and incidents, and the Court should employ that doctrine as its interpretive benchmark. The common law doctrine contains less, although some, bias toward over-regulation, and it is flexible enough to adapt to changing social conditions. Adherence to the common law doctrine would markedly improve Commerce Power jurisprudence and reduce incentives for harmful congressional behavior.

Keywords: k10,k19,k30,k39,k40

Suggested Citation

Natelson, Robert G., Tempering the Commerce Power. Montana Law Review, Vol. 68, p. 97. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1088382

Robert G. Natelson (Contact Author)

Independence & Montana Policy Institutes ( email )

727 E. 16th Ave.
Denver, CO 80203
United States
303-279-6536 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://robnatelson.com

Register to save articles to
your library


Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics