The Value of the Sunshine Cure: The Efficacy of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act Disclosure Strategy
20 Pages Posted: 5 Feb 2008
Abstract
This article examines the efficacy of the disclosure strategy of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA). Four questions are critical in evaluating the efficiency of federally mandated disclosure by itself as a regulatory strategy: whether lending and title fees are large enough to be worth regulating; whether the Good Faith Estimate mandated by RESPA is an unbiased and consistent estimator of lending and title fees; whether state law has a negligible effect on fees (and therefore only national regulation is pertinent to the problem RESPA addresses); and whether RESPA achieves fairness, in the sense that disclosure so strengthens the negotiating position of buyers and sellers relative to service providers that the principals' personal characteristics do not influence the fees they pay. This article presents preliminary tests on these issues from a small and somewhat unrepresentative sample of FHA-insured loans.
Keywords: RESPA, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Is There Discrimination in Mortgage Pricing? The Case of Overages
By Harold A. Black, Thomas P. Boehm, ...
-
Diagnosing Consumer Confusion and Sub-Optimal Shopping Effort: Theory and Mortgage-Market Evidence
By Susan E. Woodward and Robert E. Hall
-
Decisionmaking & the Limits of Disclosure: The Problem of Predatory Lending
-
A Transaction-Cost View of Title Insurance in Different Legal Systems
-
The Subprime Virus: Reckless Credit, Regulatory Failure, and Next Steps
-
Does Credit Scoring Produce a Disparate Impact?
By Robert B. Avery, Kenneth P. Brevoort, ...