The Legacy of Allotment

78 Pages Posted: 13 Feb 2008

See all articles by Judith Royster

Judith Royster

University of Tulsa College of Law


In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the federal government pursued an Indian policy of allotting tribal lands and assimilating Indians. Although Congress formally ended the practice of allotment in 1934, and repudiated the assimilation policy, the legacy of allotment lingers on in the Indian law opinions of the U.S. Supreme Court. In a series of cases that are contrary to the canons of construction, the Court's own precedents, and modern federal Indian policy, the Court diminished tribal territories and restricted tribal sovereignty over the territory that remains. This article describes the allotment policy and its repudiation by Congress, and then explores the Court's revival of allotment's legacy - first in the Court's most recent interpretation of the General Allotment Act itself, next in the cases where the Court invoked the legacy of allotment to deprive tribes of their lands, and finally in the cases where the Court left the territorial boundaries intact, but used the legacy of allotment to dispossess the tribes of full sovereign authority over those territories.

Keywords: Indian law, federal Indian policy, allotment

Suggested Citation

Royster, Judith, The Legacy of Allotment. Arizona State Law Journal, Vol. 27, p. 1, 1995, Available at SSRN:

Judith Royster (Contact Author)

University of Tulsa College of Law ( email )

3120 E. Fourth Place
Tulsa, OK 74104
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics