Warrantless Location Tracking

29 Pages Posted: 12 Feb 2008 Last revised: 15 Dec 2008

See all articles by Ian Samuel

Ian Samuel

Indiana University Maurer School of Law; Harvard Law School; New York University School of Law


The ubiquity of cell phones has transformed police investigations. Tracking a suspect's movements by following her phone is now a common but largely unnoticed surveillance technique. It is useful, no doubt, precisely because it is so revealing; it also raises significant privacy concerns. In this Note, I consider what the procedural requirements for cell phone tracking should be by examining the relevant statutory and constitutional law. Ultimately, the best standard is probable cause; only an ordinary warrant can satisfy the text of the statutes and the mandates of the Constitution.

Keywords: fourth amendment, search, seizure, cell phones, pen register, location tracking, surveillance

Suggested Citation

Samuel, Ian, Warrantless Location Tracking. New York University Law Review, Vol. 83, No. 4, October 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1092293

Ian Samuel (Contact Author)

Indiana University Maurer School of Law ( email )

211 S. Indiana Avenue
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States

Harvard Law School ( email )

1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

New York University School of Law ( email )

40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics