Social Security Privatization with Elastic Labor Supply and Second-Best Taxes

29 Pages Posted: 17 Feb 2008

See all articles by Kent A. Smetters

Kent A. Smetters

University of Pennsylvania - Business & Public Policy Department; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: January 2005

Abstract

This paper shows that many common methods of privatizing social security fail to reduce labor market distortions when taxes are second best, challenging a key reason to privatize. Ironically, providing "transition relief" to workers alive at the time of the reform, in an effort to protect their previous contributions, undercuts potential efficiency gains. Chile's reform - the first major privatization that also served as a model for subsequent countries - actually increased distortions. It is then shown that privatization with limited transition relief can reduce labor market distortions and produce gains to current and future generations without hurting initial retirees, i.e., a Pareto gain even with second-best taxes.

Suggested Citation

Smetters, Kent, Social Security Privatization with Elastic Labor Supply and Second-Best Taxes (January 2005). Michigan Retirement Research Center Research Paper No. WP 2005-092, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1093705 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1093705

Kent Smetters (Contact Author)

University of Pennsylvania - Business & Public Policy Department ( email )

3641 Locust Walk
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6372
United States

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
19
Abstract Views
389
PlumX Metrics