Politics, Community, Democracy: Appraising Cac Decision-Making in the First Five Years of Schedule A1

Posted: 29 Feb 2008

Date Written: September 2006

Abstract

The fifth anniversary of the statutory recognition procedure in Schedule A1 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 presents a timely opportunity to evaluate the Central Arbitration Committee's (CAC) work in administering the recognition procedure. This article analyses the CAC's interpretive approach in three aspects of the recognition procedure: the 'majority support likely' threshold in determining the admissibility of the union's recognition claim, the contours of the bargaining unit, and deciding whether to order a ballot in situations where the union already has majority membership amongst the workers in the bargaining unit. In each of these contexts, the article concludes that the CAC is resolving ongoing interpretive disputes in a manner that is sensitive to the underlying political values at stake.

Suggested Citation

Bogg, Alan L., Politics, Community, Democracy: Appraising Cac Decision-Making in the First Five Years of Schedule A1 (September 2006). Industrial Law Journal, Vol. 35, Issue 3, pp. 245-271, 2006. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1095605 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwl019

Alan L. Bogg (Contact Author)

University of Bristol ( email )

WIlls Building
Queens Road
Bristol, BS8 1RJ
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
226
PlumX Metrics