Reconciling Faith, Reason, and Freedom: Catholicism and Evolution from Scopes to Dover

54 Pages Posted: 24 Feb 2008 Last revised: 2 Mar 2008

See all articles by Christopher M. Hammer

Christopher M. Hammer

University of Virginia - School of Law, Alumnus or Degree Candidate Author

Date Written: February 23, 2008

Abstract

The participants in the Scopes trial presented a dramatic tension between religion and science that tended to highlight a mutual exclusivity between traditional belief in God and adherence to the theory of evolution. The reaction of the nation's Roman Catholics to the trial, underrepresented in previous scholarly accounts, tend to undermine this stark dichotomy between religion and science. This paper traces reactions to the trial published in Catholic periodicals to present their acceptance of the principles underlying each side of the trial - the defense's appeal to human reason and the prosecution's appeal to faith - and their rejection of what they considered to be each side's excesses. These same tensions - deriving from the principle of compatibility between the Catholic faith and scientific observation - were present in the Dover litigation over a school district's promotion of the alternative theory of intelligent design to explain human origins.

Keywords: evolution, Catholicism, legal history, Scopes, Kitzmiller v. Dover, science and religion, religious liberty, intelligent design, creationism

Suggested Citation

Hammer, Christopher M., Reconciling Faith, Reason, and Freedom: Catholicism and Evolution from Scopes to Dover (February 23, 2008). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1097098 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1097098

Christopher M. Hammer (Contact Author)

University of Virginia - School of Law, Alumnus or Degree Candidate Author ( email )

580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
144
rank
197,554
Abstract Views
1,212
PlumX Metrics