Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

The Iconic Insider Trading Cases

32 Pages Posted: 26 Feb 2008  

Stephen M. Bainbridge

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law

Abstract

This essay traces the evolution of insider trading jurisprudence, focusing on the three iconic Supreme Court decisions: Chiarella, Dirks, and O'Hagan. The essay argues that all three cases were seriously flawed because each failed to cohere as to either policy or doctrine. Just as a child might break his toy by attempting to force a square peg into a round hole, the Supreme Court made a hash of insider trading law (and Rule 10b-5 generally) by attempting to force insider trading into a paradigm - securities fraud - that does not fit.

Keywords: insider trading

JEL Classification: K22

Suggested Citation

Bainbridge, Stephen M., The Iconic Insider Trading Cases. UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 08-05. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1097744 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1097744

Stephen Mark Bainbridge (Contact Author)

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )

385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
310-206-1599 (Phone)
310-825-6023 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.professorbainbridge.com

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,338
Rank
11,037
Abstract Views
5,883