Not All Growth is Equally Good for the Poor: The Case of Zambia

Posted: 29 Feb 2008

See all articles by James Thurlow

James Thurlow

UNU-WIDER; International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)

Peter Wobst

Independent

Date Written: December 2006

Abstract

Cross-country studies typically find growth to be the best means of alleviating poverty, with a less important role attributed to reducing inequality. However, shifts in the structure of growth can lead to very difficult poverty outcomes, with different population groups participating in the growth process. This article uses an applied general equilibrium and micro-simulation model to examine how the sectoral structure of growth in Zambia influences the degree of poverty reduction. Drawing on the country's recent growth history, the effects of accelerating growth in agriculture, mining and manufacturing are compared. Despite high urban poverty, a return to urban-based mining and manufacturing is found to be less favourable than faster intensification and diversification of agriculture, although broad-based growth is required for long-term poverty reduction. Therefore, while growth in general may be good for the poor, it is found that that not all growth is equally good.

Suggested Citation

Thurlow, James and Wobst, Peter, Not All Growth is Equally Good for the Poor: The Case of Zambia (December 2006). Journal of African Economies, Vol. 15, Issue 4, pp. 603-625, 2006, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1098678 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejk012

James Thurlow

UNU-WIDER ( email )

Katajanokanlaituri 6B
Helsinki, FIN-00160
Finland

International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) ( email )

1201 Eye St, NW,
Washington, DC 20005
United States

Peter Wobst

Independent

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
529
PlumX Metrics