Endorsing Discrimination between Faiths: A Case of Extreme Speech?

15 Pages Posted: 5 Mar 2008 Last revised: 24 Mar 2015

See all articles by John Finnis

John Finnis

Notre Dame Law School; University of Oxford - Faculty of Law

Abstract

The question whether government and law can discriminate between different religious faiths (or their adherents as such) is given a resounding answer by a unanimous Grand Chamber (seventeen judges) of the European Court of Human Rights in Refah Partisi (No. 2) v Turkey (2003), upholding the dissolution of the largest political party in Turkey's legislature on the ground that, as a dominant member of the governing coalition, it intended to introduce sharia law either for everyone or as part of a plural system of laws for citizens of different faiths. For sharia, the court held, is inherently (and even if adopted democratically and without threats of force) incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights and the conceptions of democracy and the rule of law which the Convention enshrines. Refah in turn grounds the same Court's decision in Sahin v Turkey (2005), upholding the prohibition of the wearing of head scarves in universities in Turkey. And Sahin is, inconspicuously but clearly enough, at the foundation of the House of Lords' decision in R (Begum) v Denbigh High School Governors [2006] UKHL 15, [2007] 1 AC 100. The present paper, written for a volume of essays on extreme speech and democracy, argues that despite its unpersuasive reasoning (in which essential premises such as those displayed in Sahin and Refah are never sufficiently articulated), Begum was rightly decided, and that - especially in relation to immigration - it is not extremist, or a case of extreme speech, to propose discrimination analogous to that endorsed by the Strasbourg Court in those cases.

Keywords: Justified discrimination, religion, faiths, shariah, immigration, speech, Begum, Refah Partisi, human rights litigation

Suggested Citation

Finnis, John M., Endorsing Discrimination between Faiths: A Case of Extreme Speech?. Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09/2008; Extreme Speech and Democracy, Forthcoming; Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 08-08; Islamic Law and Law of the Muslim World No. 08-16. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1101522

Notre Dame Law Submitter (Contact Author)

Notre Dame Law School

P.O. Box 780
Notre Dame, IN 46556-0780
United States

The Law School

361 Mendoza College of Business
Notre Dame, IN 46556-5646
United States
574-631-5866 (Phone)

John M. Finnis

Notre Dame Law School ( email )

P.O. Box 780
Notre Dame, IN 46556-0780
United States

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )

University College
High Street
Oxford, England OX1 4BH
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,012
rank
20,316
Abstract Views
5,028
PlumX Metrics