Beyond Schumpeter vs. Arrow: How Antitrust Fosters Innovation

32 Pages Posted: 11 Mar 2008

Date Written: February 8, 2007

Abstract

The relationship between competition and innovation is the subject of a familiar controversy in economics, between the Schumpeterian view that monopolies favor innovation and the opposite view, often associated with Kenneth Arrow, that competition favors innovation. Taking their cue from this debate, some commentators reserve judgment as to whether antitrust enforcement is good for innovation. Such misgivings are unnecessary. The modern economic learning about the connection between competition and innovation helps clarify the types of firm conduct and industry settings where antitrust interventions are most likely to foster innovation. Measured against this standard, contemporary competition policy holds up well. Today's antitrust institutions support innovation by targeting types of industries and practices where antitrust enforcement would enhance research and development incentives the most. It is time to move beyond the "on-the-one-hand Schumpeter, on-the-other-hand Arrow" debate and embrace antitrust as essential for fostering innovation.

Keywords: innovation, competition, economic analysis

Suggested Citation

Baker, Jonathan B., Beyond Schumpeter vs. Arrow: How Antitrust Fosters Innovation (February 8, 2007). American Antitrust Institute Working Paper No. 07-04. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1103623 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1103623

Jonathan B. Baker (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
91
Abstract Views
693
rank
278,114
PlumX Metrics