International Law, Human Rights and the Transformative Occupation of Iraq

THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN REBUILDING SOCIETIES AFTER CONFLICT: GREAT EXPECTATIONS, p. 64, Brett Bowden, Hilary Charlesworth, and Jeremy Farrall, eds., Cambridge University Press, 2009

U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-11

27 Pages Posted: 11 Mar 2008 Last revised: 9 Nov 2010

See all articles by Peter Danchin

Peter Danchin

University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law

Date Written: 2009

Abstract

This chapter examines the project of transformative occupation undertaken by the United States and its allies following the invasion of Iraq in 2003. More specifically, it considers the Iraqi occupation in light of two competing sensibilities in international legal argument. On one view, which I term "legal formalism", the purpose of international law is eclectic, intersubjective and value-pluralist: to create the conditions for peaceful coexistence between different political orders and ways of life. This view is commonly associated with the liberalism of the United Nations Charter which posits both the subject of international law and its liberty in formal terms as "the state" and "sovereign equality" respectively. On a rival view, which I term "instrumental anti-pluralism", the purpose of international law is to project a universal regime based on a rationally reconstructed and universally authoritative morality. Here the identity of the sovereign as a subject of international law is understood in material terms as "the liberal democratic state" and sovereignty is understood as the equal treatment of legal subjects so defined. The chapter argues that that the attempt to transform the Iraqi constitutional structure via military occupation illustrates the complex dialectic between the formal and instrumental views, a dialectic that oscillates precariously between imperial imposition in the name of liberal democracy on the one hand, and a desperate attempt to secure internal legitimation for the new political order on the other. The role of international law in this process is ambiguous and paradoxical. On one hand, the law assumes an instrumentalist anti-formal guise facilitating the external project of imposing subjective material norms on a resistant political order. On the other hand, it provides a formal anti-instrumental site of deliberation, contestation and struggle critical to the internal project of the emergence of a distinctly Iraqi constitutionalism. The contradictions generated by this dialectic allow us to see how international law both constructs and mediates between certain "internal" and "external" forms of rationality.

Keywords: Iraq, occupation, Iraqi constitution,

Suggested Citation

Danchin, Peter G., International Law, Human Rights and the Transformative Occupation of Iraq (2009). THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN REBUILDING SOCIETIES AFTER CONFLICT: GREAT EXPECTATIONS, p. 64, Brett Bowden, Hilary Charlesworth, and Jeremy Farrall, eds., Cambridge University Press, 2009, U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-11, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1105067

Peter G. Danchin (Contact Author)

University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law ( email )

500 West Baltimore Street
Room 446
Baltimore, MD 21201
United States
410 706 3960 (Phone)
410 706 2184 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.umaryland.edu/faculty_profile.asp?facultynum=467

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
300
Abstract Views
1,382
rank
125,177
PlumX Metrics