The Lexington

Joseph Conrad Sweeney

Fordham University School of Law

Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2008

The decision by the Supreme Court in New Jersey Steam Navigation Co. v. Merchants' Bank of Boston (The Lexington) marked a turning point in American legal history. Federal courts sitting as courts of admiralty had been preoccupied with war and neutrality and the extension of maritime law to inland waters. But in the case of the Lexington the Court decided that the admiralty jurisdiction of the United States is not defined by limits found in ancient English statutes and customs. In the same case, the Court held that a marine carrier could be liable to a shipper for damage to cargo despite exculpatory clauses in the contract of carriage, anticipating the Harter Act of 1893 and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act of 1936. With these decisions, the Court prepared the courts of the United States to serve the emerging commercial needs of a proud new democracy.

Keywords: admiralty, jurisdiction, shipping, affreightment, carrier, cargo, Lexington, Harter, Carriage of Goods by Sea

JEL Classification: K19, K39, K41

Not Available For Download

Date posted: March 12, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Sweeney, Joseph Conrad, The Lexington. Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2008. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1105165

Contact Information

Joseph Conrad Sweeney (Contact Author)
Fordham University School of Law ( email )
140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,118